Matyas's
reforms did not survive the turbulent decades that followed
his reign. An oligarchy of quarrelsome magnates gained
control of Hungary. They crowned a docile king, Vladislav
Jagiello (the Jagiellonian king of Bohemia, who was known in
Hungary as Ulaszlo II, 1490-1516), only on condition that he
abolish the taxes that had supported Matyas's mercenary
army. As a result, the king's army dispersed just as the
Turks were threatening Hungary. The magnates also dismantled
Matyas's administration and antagonized the lesser nobles.
In 1492 the Diet limited the serfs' freedom of movement and
expanded their obligations. Rural discontent boiled over in
1514 when well-armed peasants (if they are in rebellion they
are not really acting as serfs) under Gyorgy Dozsa rose up
and attacked estates across Hungary. United by a common
threat, the magnates and lesser nobles eventually crushed
the rebels. Dozsa and other rebel leaders were executed in a
most brutal manner. Shocked
by the peasant revolt, the Diet of 1514 passed laws that
condemned the serfs to eternal bondage and increased their
work obligations. Corporal punishment became widespread, and
one noble even branded his serfs like livestock. The legal
scholar Stephen Werboczy included the new laws in his
Tripartitum of 1514, which made up Hungary's legal corpus
until the revolution of 1848. The Tripartitum gave Hungary's
king and nobles, or magnates, equal shares of power: the
nobles recognized the king as superior, but in turn the
nobles had the power to elect the king. The Tripartitum also
freed the nobles from taxation, obligated them to serve in
the military only in a defensive war, and made them immune
from arbitrary arrest. The new laws weakened Hungary by
deepening the rift between the nobles and the peasantry just
as the Turks prepared to invade the country. When
Ulaszlo II died in 1516, his ten-year-old son Louis II
(1516-26) became king, but a royal council appointed by the
Diet ruled the country. Hungary was in a state of near
anarchy under the magnates' rule. The king's finances were a
shambles; he borrowed to meet his household expenses despite
the fact that they totaled about one-third of the national
income. The country's defenses sagged as border guards went
unpaid, fortresses fell into disrepair, and initiatives to
increase taxes to reinforce defenses were stifled. In 1521
Sultan Suleyman the Magnificent recognized Hungary's
weakness and seized Belgrade in preparation for an attack on
Hungary. In August 1526, he marched more than 100,000 troops
into Hungary's heartland, and at Mohacs they cut down all
but several hundred of the 25,000 ill-equipped soldiers whom
Louis II had been able to muster for the country's defense.
Louis himself died, thrown from a horse into a
bog. After
Louis's death, rival factions of Hungarian nobles
simultaneously elected two kings, Janos Zapolyai (1526-40)
and Ferdinand (1526-64). Each claimed sovereignty over the
entire country but lacked sufficient forces to eliminate his
rival. Zapolyai, a Hungarian and the military governor of
Transylvania, was recognized by the sultan and was supported
mostly by lesser nobles opposed to new foreign kings.
Ferdinand, the first Habsburg to occupy the Hungarian
throne, drew support from magnates in western Hungary who
hoped he could convince his brother, Holy Roman Emperor
Charles V, to expel the Turks. In 1538 George Martinuzzi,
Zapolyai's adviser, arranged a treaty between the rivals
that would have made Ferdinand sole monarch upon the death
of the then-childless Zapolyai. The deal collapsed when
Zapolyai married and fathered a son. Violence erupted, and
the Turks seized the opportunity, conquering the city of
Buda and then partitioning the country in 1541. Renaissance
and Reformation
<<< Contents
>>> Partition
of Hungary
Library of Congress Country Study Reign
of Ulaszlo II and Louis II
Library of Congress Country Study
This document is in the public domain. You may copy, download, print and distribute this work as you see fit.Every effort has been made to present this text accurately and cleanly, but no guarantees are made against errors. Neither Melissa Snell nor About.com may be held liable for any problems you experience with the text version or with any electronic form of the document.
More at the Medieval History Site
Site
Map
FAQs
Quizzes
Reviews
Daily
Features
More about the Knightly Newsletter

