The
Hashimite monarchy was overthrown on July 14, 1958, in a
swift, predawn coup executed by officers of the Nineteenth
Brigade under the leadership of Brigadier Abd al Karim Qasim
and Colonel Abd as Salaam Arif. The coup was triggered when
King Hussein, fearing that an anti-Western revolt in Lebanon
might spread to Jordan, requested Iraqi assistance. Instead
of moving toward Jordan, however, Colonel Arif led a
battalion into Baghdad and immediately proclaimed a new
republic and the end of the old regime. The July 14
Revolution met virtually no opposition and proclamations of
the revolution brought crowds of people into the streets of
Baghdad cheering for the deaths of Iraq's two "strong men,"
Nuri as Said and Abd al Ilah. King Faisal II and Abd al Ilah
were executed, as were many others in the royal family. Nuri
as Said also was killed after attempting to escape disguised
as a veiled woman. In the ensuing mob demonstrations against
the old order, angry crowds severely damaged the British
embassy. Put in
its historical context, the July 14 Revolution was the
culmination of a series of uprisings and coup attempts that
began with the 1936 Bakr Sidqi coup and included the 1941
Rashid Ali military movement, the 1948 Wathbah Uprising, and
the 1952 and 1956 protests. The revolution radically altered
Iraq's social structure, destroying the power of the landed
shaykhs and the absentee landlords while enhancing the
position of the urban workers, the peasants, and the middle
class. In altering the old power structure, however, the
revolution revived long-suppressed sectarian, tribal, and
ethnic conflicts. The strongest of these conflicts were
those between Kurds and Arabs and between Sunnis and
Shias. Despite a
shared military background, the group of Free
Officers
(see Glossary) that carried out the July 14 Revolution was
plagued by internal dissension. Its members lacked both a
coherent ideology and an effective organizational structure.
Many of the more senior officers resented having to take
orders from Arif, their junior in rank. A power struggle
developed between Qasim and Arif over joining the
Egyptian-Syrian union. Arif's pro-Nasserite sympathies were
supported by the Baath Party, while Qasim found support for
his anti-union position in the ranks of the communists.
Qasim, the more experienced and higher ranking of the two,
eventually emerged victorious. Arif was first dismissed,
then brought to trial for treason and condemned to death in
January 1959; he was subsequently pardoned in December
1962. Whereas
he implemented many reforms that favored the poor, Qasim was
primarily a centrist in outlook, proposing to improve the
lot of the poor while not dispossessing the wealthy. In
part, his ambiguous policies were a product of his lack of a
solid base of support, especially in the military. Unlike
the bulk of military officers, Qasim did not come from the
Arab Sunni northwestern towns nor did he share their
enthusiasm for pan- Arabism: he was of mixed Sunni-Shia
parentage from southeastern Iraq. Qasim's ability to remain
in power depended, therefore, on a skillful balancing of the
communists and the pan-Arabists. For most of his tenure,
Qasim sought to counterbalance the growing pan-Arab trend in
the military by supporting the communists who controlled the
streets. He authorized the formation of a
communist-controlled militia, the People's Resistance Force,
and he freed all communist prisoners. Qasim's
economic policies reflected his poor origins and his ties
with the communists. He permitted trade unions, improved
workers' conditions, and implemented land reform aimed at
dismantling the old feudal structure of the countryside.
Qasim also challenged the existing profit-sharing
arrangements with the oil companies. On December 11, 1961,
he passed Public Law 80, which dispossessed the IPC of 99.5
percent of its concession area, leaving it to operate only
in those areas currently in production. The new arrangement
significantly increased oil revenues accruing to the
government. Qasim also announced the establishment of an
Iraq National Oil Company (INOC) to exploit the new
territory. In March
1959, a group of disgruntled Free Officers, who came from
conservative, well-known, Arab Sunni families and who
opposed Qasim's increasing links with the communists,
attempted a coup. Aware of the planned coup, Qasim had his
communist allies mobilize 250,000 of their supporters in
Mosul. The ill-planned coup attempt never really
materialized and, in its aftermath, the communists massacred
nationalists and some well-to-do Mosul families, leaving
deep scars that proved to be very slow to heal. Throughout
1959 the ranks of the ICP swelled as the party increased its
presence in both the military and the government. In 1959
Qasim reestablished diplomatic relations between Iraq and
Moscow, an extensive Iraqi-Soviet economic agreement was
signed, and arms deliveries began. With communist fortunes
riding high, another large-scale show of force was planned
in Kirkuk, where a significant number of Kurds (many of them
either members of, or sympathetic to, the ICP) lived in
neighborhoods contiguous to a Turkoman upper class. In
Kirkuk, however, communist rallies got out of hand. A bloody
battle ensued, and the Kurds looted and killed many
Turkomans. The communist-initiated violence at Kirkuk led
Qasim to crack down on the organization, by arresting some
of the more unruly rank-and-file members and by temporarily
suspending the People's Resistance Force. Following the
events at Mosul and at Kirkuk, the Baath and its leader,
Fuad Rikabi, decided that the only way to dislodge the Qasim
regime would be to kill Qasim (see Coups,
Coup Attempts, and Foreign
Policy
, this ch.). The future president, Saddam Husayn, carried
out the attempted assassination, which injured Qasim but
failed to kill him. Qasim reacted by softening his stance on
the communists and by suppressing the activities of the
Baath and other nationalist parties. The renewed
communist-Qasim relationship did not last long, however.
Throughout 1960 and 1961, sensing that the communists had
become too strong, Qasim again moved against the party by
eliminating members from sensitive government positions, by
cracking down on trade unions and on peasant associations,
and by shutting down the communist press. Qasim's
divorce from the communists, his alienation from the
nationalists, his aloof manner, and his monopoly of
power--he was frequently referred to as the "sole
leader"--isolated him from a domestic power base. In 1961
his tenuous hold on power was further weakened when the
Kurds again took up arms against the central
government. The Kurds
had ardently supported the 1958 revolution. Indeed, the new
constitution put forth by Qasim and Arif had stipulated that
the Kurds and the Arabs would be equal partners in the new
state. Exiled Kurdish leaders, including Mullah Mustafa
Barzani, were allowed to return. Mutual suspicions, however,
soon soured the Barzani-Qasim relationship; in September
1961, full-scale fighting broke out between Kurdish
guerrillas and the Iraqi army. The army did not fare well
against the seasoned Kurdish guerrillas, many of whom had
deserted from the army. By the spring of 1962, Qasim's
inability to contain the Kurdish insurrection had further
eroded his base of power. The growing opposition was now in
a position to plot his overthrow. Qasim's
domestic problems were compounded by a number of foreign
policy crises, the foremost of which was an escalating
conflict with the shah of Iran. Although he had reined in
the communists, Qasim's leftist sympathies aroused fears in
the West and in neighboring Gulf states of an imminent
communist takeover of Iraq. In April 1959, Allen Dulles, the
director of the United States Central Intelligence Agency,
described the situation in Iraq "as the most dangerous in
the world." The pro-Western shah found Qasim's communist
sympathies and his claims on Iranian Khuzestan (an area that
stretched from Dezful to Ahvaz in Iran and that contained a
majority of Iranians of Arab descent) to be anathema. In
December 1959, Iraqi-Iranian relations rapidly deteriorated
when Qasim, reacting to Iran's reopening of the Shatt al
Arab dispute, nullified the 1937 agreement and claimed
sovereignty over the anchorage area near Abadan. In July
1961, Qasim further alienated the West and pro-Western
regional states by laying claim to the newly independent
state of Kuwait. When the Arab League unanimously accepted
Kuwait's membership, Iraq broke off diplomatic relations
with its Arab neighbors. Qasim was completely
isolated. In
February 1963, hemmed in by regional enemies and facing
Kurdish insurrection in the north and a growing nationalist
movement at home, Qasim was overthrown. Despite the long
list of enemies who opposed him in his final days, Qasim was
a hero to millions of urban poor and impoverished peasants,
many of whom rushed to his defense. The
inability of the masses to stave off the nationalist
onslaught attested to the near total divorce of the Iraqi
people from the political process. From the days of the
monarchy, the legitimacy of the political process had
suffered repeated blows. The government's British legacy,
Nuri as Said's authoritarianism, and the rapid encroachment
of the military (who paid only scant homage to the
institutions of state) had eroded the people's faith in the
government; furthermore, Qasim's inability to stem the
increasing ethnic, sectarian, and class-inspired violence
reflected an even deeper malaise. The unraveling of Iraq's
traditional social structure upset a precarious balance of
social forces. Centuries-old religious and sectarian hatreds
now combined with more recent class antagonisms in a
volatile mix. Independent
Monarchy
<<< Contents
>>> Coups,
Coup Attempts...
Library of Congress Country Study
Library of Congress Country Study
This document is in the public domain. You may copy, download, print and distribute this work as you see fit.Every effort has been made to present this text accurately and cleanly, but no guarantees are made against errors. Neither Melissa Snell nor About.com may be held liable for any problems you experience with the text version or with any electronic form of the document.
More at the Medieval History Site
New posts to the Medieval History forums:
Site
Map
FAQs
Quizzes
Reviews
Daily
Features
More about the Knightly Newsletter

