Most
historians believe that the Croats are a purely Slavic
people who probably migrated to the Balkans from the
present-day Ukraine. A newer theory, however, holds that the
original Croats were nomadic Sarmatians who roamed Central
Asia, migrated onto the steppes around 200 B.C., and rode
into Europe near the end of the fourth century A.D.,
possibly together with the Huns. The Sarmatian Croats, the
theory holds, conquered the Slavs of northern Bohemia and
southern Poland and formed a small state called White
Croatia near today's Kraków. The Croats then
supposedly mingled with their more numerous Slavic subjects
and adopted the Slavic language, while the subjects assumed
the tribal name "Croat." A
tenth-century Byzantine source reports that in the seventh
century Emperor Heraclius enlisted the Croats to expel the
Avars from Byzantine lands. The Croats overran the Avars and
Slavs in Dalmatia around 630 and then drove the Avars from
today's Slovenia and other areas. In the eighth century, the
Croats lived under loose Byzantine rule, and Christianity
and Latin culture recovered in the coastal cities. The
Franks subjugated most of the Croats in the eighth century
and sent missionaries to baptize them in the Latin rite, but
the Byzantine Empire continued to rule Dalmatia. Croatia
emerged as an independent nation in 924. Tomislav (910-c.
928), a tribal leader, established himself as the first king
of Croatia, ruling a domain that stretched eastward to the
Danube. Croatia and Venice struggled to dominate Dalmatia as
the power of Byzantium faded, and for a time the Dalmatians
paid the Croats tribute to assure safe passage for their
galleys through the Adriatic. After the Great Schism of 1054
split the Roman and Byzantine churches, Normans (probably
with papal support) besieged Byzantine cities in Dalmatia.
In 1075 a papal legate crowned Dmitrije Zvonimir (1076-89)
king of Croatia. A faction
of nobles contesting the succession after the death of
Zvonimir offered the Croatian throne to King
László of Hungary. In 1091
László accepted, and in 1094 he founded the
Zagreb bishopric, which later became the ecclestictical
center of Croatia. Another Hungarian king,
Kálmán, crushed opposition after the death of
László and won the crown of Dalmatia and
Croatia in 1102. The crowning of Kálmán forged
a link between the Croatian and Hungarian crowns that lasted
until the end of World War I. Croats have maintained for
centuries that Croatia remained a sovereign state despite
the voluntary union of the two crowns, but Hungarians claim
that Hungary annexed Croatia outright in 1102. In either
case, Hungarian culture permeated Croatia, the
Croatian-Hungarian border shifted often, and at times
Hungary treated Croatia as a vassal state. Croatia, however,
had its own local governor, or ban; a privileged
landowning nobility; and an assembly of nobles, the
Sabor. The
joining of the Croatian and Hungarian crowns automatically
made Hungary and Venice rivals for domination of Dalmatia.
Hungary sought access to the sea, while Venice wished to
secure its trade routes to the eastern Mediterranean and to
use Dalmatian timber for shipbuilding. Between 1115 and
1420, the two powers waged twenty-one wars for control of
the region and Dalmatian cities changed hands repeatedly.
Serbia and Bosnia also competed for Dalmatia. Serbia seized
the coast south of the Gulf of Kotor on the southern
Adriatic coast around 1196 and held it for 150 years; Bosnia
dominated central Dalmatia during the late fourteenth
century. Dalmatian cities struggled to remain autonomous by
playing one power against the others. Most successful in
this strategy was Dubrovnik, whose riches and influence at
times rivaled those of Venice. In the fourteenth century,
Dubrovnik became the first Christian power to establish
treaty relations with the Ottoman Empire, which was then
advancing across the Balkans. Dubrovnik prospered by
mediating between Europe and the new Ottoman provinces in
Europe, and by exporting precious metals, raw materials,
agricultural goods, and slaves. After centuries as the only
free South Slav political entity, the city waned in power
following a severe earthquake in 1667. In 1409
Ladislas of Naples, a claimant to the throne of Hungary,
sold Venice his rights to Dalmatia. By 1420 Venice
controlled virtually all of Dalmatia except Dubrovnik. The
Venetians made Dalmatia their poorest, most backward
province: they reduced Dalmatian local autonomy, cut the
forests, and stifled industry. Venice also restricted
education, so that Zadar, the administrative center of
Dalmatia, lacked even a printing press until 1796. Despite
centuries of struggle for dominance of the region and
exploitation by Venice, Dalmatia produced several first-rate
artists and intellectuals, including the sculptor Radovan,
Juraj Dalmatinac, an architect and sculptor, writer Ivan
Gundulic, and scientist Rudjer Boskovic. Ottoman
armies overran all of eastern and southern Croatia south of
the Sava River in the early sixteenth century, and
slaughtered a weak Hungarian force at the Battle of
Moh·cs (Hungary) in 1526. Buda was captured in 1541,
then Turkish marauders advanced toward Austria. After
Moh·cs, Hungarian and Croatian nobles elected the
Habsburg Ferdinand I of Austria king of Hungary and Croatia.
To tighten its grip on Croatia and solidify its defenses,
Austria restricted the powers of the Sabor,
established a military border across Croatia, and recruited
Germans, Hungarians, Serbs, and other Slavs to serve as
peasant border guards. This practice was the basis for the
ethnic patchwork that survives today in Croatia, Slavonia,
and Vojvodina. Austria assumed ownership and direct control
of the border lands, and gave local independence and land to
families who agreed to settle and guard those lands.
Orthodox border families also won freedom of worship, which
drew stiff opposition from the Roman Catholic
Church. Turkish
inroads in Croatia and Austria also triggered price
increases for agricultural goods, and opportunistic
landowners began demanding payment in kind, rather than
cash, from serfs. Rural discontent exploded in 1573 when
Matija Gubec led an organized peasant rebellion that spread
quickly before panic- stricken nobles were able to quell
it. Religious
ferment in Europe affected Croatian culture in the sixteenth
century. Many Croatian and Dalmatian nobles embraced the
Protestant Reformation in the mid-sixteenth century, and in
1562 Stipan Konzul and Anton Dalmatin published the first
Croatian Bible. The Counterreformation began in Croatia and
Dalmatia in the early seventeenth century, and the most
powerful Protestant noblemen soon reconverted. In 1609 the
Sabor voted to allow only the Catholic faith in Croatia. The
Counterreformation enhanced the cultural development of
Croatia. Jesuits founded schools and published grammars, a
dictionary, and religious books that helped shape the
Croatian literary language. Franciscans preached the
Counterreformation in Ottoman-held regions. Western
forces routed a Turkish army besieging Vienna in 1683 and
then began driving the Turks from Europe. In the 1699 Treaty
of Karlowitz, the Turks ceded most of Hungary, Croatia, and
Slavonia to Austria, and by 1718 they no longer threatened
Dalmatia. During the Western advance, Austria expanded its
military border, and thousands of Serbs fleeing Turkish
oppression settled as border guards in Slavonia and southern
Hungary (see fig. 2). As the Turkish threat waned, Croatian
nobles demanded reincorporation of the military border into
Croatia. Austria, which used the guards as an inexpensive
standing military force, rejected these demands, and the
guards themselves opposed abrogation of their special
privileges. From 1780
to 1790, Joseph II of Austria introduced reforms that
exposed ethnic and linguistic rivalries. Among other things,
Joseph brought the empire under strict central control and
decreed that German replace Latin as the official language
of the empire. This decree enraged the Hungarians, who
rejected Germanization and fought to make their language,
Magyar, the official language of Hungary. The Croats,
fearing both Germanization and Magyarization, defended
Latin. In 1790, when Joseph died, Hungary was on the verge
of rebellion. Joseph's successor, Leopold II, abandoned
centralization and Germanization when he signed laws
ensuring Hungary's status as an independent kingdom under an
Austrian king. The next Austrian emperor, Francis I, stifled
Hungarian political development for almost four decades,
during which Magyarization was not an issue. Venice
repulsed Ottoman attacks on Dalmatia for several centuries
after the Battle of Moh·cs, and it helped to push the
Turks from the coastal area after 1693. But by the late
eighteenth century, trade routes had shifted, Venice had
declined, and Dalmatian ships stood idle. Napoleon ended the
Venetian Republic and defeated Austria; he then incorporated
Dalmatia, Dubrovnik, and western Croatia as the French
Illyrian Provinces. France stimulated agriculture and
commerce in the provinces, fought piracy, enhanced the
status of the Orthodox population, and stirred a Croatian
national awakening. In 1814 the military border and Dalmatia
returned to Austria when Napoleon was defeated; Hungary
regained Croatia and Slavonia. In 1816 Austria transformed
most of the Illyrian Provinces into the Kingdom of Illyria,
an administrative unit designed to counterbalance radical
Hungarian nationalism and coopt nascent movements for union
of the South Slavs. Austria kept Dalmatia for itself and
reduced the privileges of the Dalmatian nobles. The
Croatian-Hungarian language conflict reemerged in the 1830s,
as Hungarian reformers grew more critical of Austrian
domination. French-educated Croatian leaders, fearing
Hungarian linguistic and political domination, began
promoting the Croatian language and formation of a Slavic
kingdom within the Austrian Empire. In 1832, for the first
time in centuries, a Croatian noble addressed the Sabor in
Croatian. With tacit Austrian approval, Ljudevit Gaj, a
journalist and linguist, promoted a South Slavic literary
language, devised a Latin-based script, and in 1836 founded
an anti-Hungarian journal that called for Illyrian cultural
and political unity. Hungary feared the Illyrian movement
and banned even public utterance of the word "Illyria." In
1843 the Hungarian assembly voted to make Magyar the
official language of Hungary and Slavonia, and eventually to
make it the official language of Hungarian-Croatian
relations. Croats called the law an infringement on their
autonomy, saturated Vienna with petitions for separation
from Hungary, and returned to Budapest all documents sent
them in Hungarian. Hungary
rose against Austria during the revolution that swept Europe
in 1848. The Croats, rightly fearing Hungarian chauvinism
and expecting union of Croatia, Slavonia, and Dalmatia,
sided with Austria. Ban Josip Jelacic led an army that
attacked the Hungarian revolutionary forces. His units soon
withdrew, but Russian troops invaded Hungary to crush the
revolution. Despite their loyalty to Austria, the Croats
received only the abolition of serfdom. Rather than uniting
the Slavic regions as promised, the emperor suspended the
constitution and introduced absolutist rule and
Germanization. Austria
ended absolutist rule in 1860, and a military defeat in 1866
brought the empire to the brink of collapse. In 1867 Emperor
Franz Joseph entered the Dual Monarchy with Hungary, uniting
the two states under a single crown. Conflicting interests
kept Austria-Hungary from uniting the South Slavs: Croatia
and Slavonia fell under Hungarian control, while Austria
retained Dalmatia. In 1868 a Sabor dominated by
pro-Hungarian deputies adopted the Nagodba, or compromise,
which affirmed that Hungary and Croatia comprised distinct
political units within the empire. Croatia obtained autonomy
in internal matters, but finance and other
Croatian-Hungarian or Austro-Hungarian concerns required
approval from Budapest and Vienna. Hungarian leaders
considered that the Nagodba provided ample home rule for
Croatia, but Croatia opposed it strongly. A subsequent
election law guaranteed pro-Hungarian landowners and
officials a majority in the Sabor and increased Croatian
hatred for Hungarian domination. Croatian members of the
Hungarian assembly then resorted to obstructionism to
enhance their meager influence. After
1868 the Croatian leadership was divided between advocates
of a South Slav union and nationalists favoring a Greater
Croatia; a bitter rivalry developed between the Croats and
Serbs. Bishop Josip Strossmayer dominated the Croatian South
Slav movement and supported liturgical concessions to help
reduce the religious differences dividing Croats and Serbs.
In pursuit of a South Slav cultural union, he founded the
Yugoslav Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1867 and the
University of Zagreb in 1874. Ante Starcevic opposed
Strossmayer, pressed for a Greater Croatia, and founded an
extreme nationalist party. In 1881 Austria-Hungary
reincorporated the military border into Croatia, increasing
the number of ethnic Serbs in Croatia to about 25 percent of
its 2.6 million population. The change raised ethnic
tensions. The Croats' ill will toward Hungary and ethnic
Serbs deepened under Ban Karoly Khuen-HÈderv·ry
(1883-1903), who ignored the Nagodba and exploited
the Croatian-Serbian rivalry to promote Magyarization. In
1903 Hungary rejected Croatian demands for financial
independence, quelled demonstrations, and suppressed the
Croatian press. After 1903 moderate Croats and ethnic Serbs
found common ground, and by 1908 a Croatian-Serbian
coalition won a Sabor majority and condemned Austria's
annexation of Bosnia-Hercegovina. A new ban, hoping to split
the coalition, brought bogus treason charges against ethnic
Serbian leaders in Croatia; the subsequent trials
scandalized Europe and strengthened the tenuous
Croatian-Serbian coalition. The
Slovenes
<<< Contents
>>> The
Serbs
Library of Congress Country StudyThe
Croats and Their Territories
Library of Congress Country Study
This document is in the public domain. You may copy, download, print and distribute this work as you see fit.Every effort has been made to present this text accurately and cleanly, but no guarantees are made against errors. Neither Melissa Snell nor About.com may be held liable for any problems you experience with the text version or with any electronic form of the document.
More at the Medieval History Site
Site
Map
FAQs
Quizzes
Reviews
Daily
Features
More about the Knightly Newsletter

