Matyas's reforms
did not survive the turbulent decades that followed his
reign. An oligarchy of quarrelsome magnates gained control
of Hungary. They crowned a docile king, Vladislav Jagiello
(the Jagiellonian king of Bohemia, who was known in Hungary
as Ulaszlo II, 1490-1516), only on condition that he abolish
the taxes that had supported Matyas's mercenary army. As a
result, the king's army dispersed just as the Turks were
threatening Hungary. The magnates also dismantled Matyas's
administration and antagonized the lesser nobles. In 1492
the Diet limited the serfs' freedom of movement and expanded
their obligations. Rural discontent boiled over in 1514 when
well-armed peasants (if they are in rebellion they are not
really acting as serfs) under Gyorgy Dozsa rose up and
attacked estates across Hungary. United by a common threat,
the magnates and lesser nobles eventually crushed the
rebels. Dozsa and other rebel leaders were executed in a
most brutal manner. Shocked by the
peasant revolt, the Diet of 1514 passed laws that condemned
the serfs to eternal bondage and increased their work
obligations. Corporal punishment became widespread, and one
noble even branded his serfs like livestock. The legal
scholar Stephen Werboczy included the new laws in his
Tripartitum of 1514, which made up Hungary's legal corpus
until the revolution of 1848. The Tripartitum gave Hungary's
king and nobles, or magnates, equal shares of power: the
nobles recognized the king as superior, but in turn the
nobles had the power to elect the king. The Tripartitum also
freed the nobles from taxation, obligated them to serve in
the military only in a defensive war, and made them immune
from arbitrary arrest. The new laws weakened Hungary by
deepening the rift between the nobles and the peasantry just
as the Turks prepared to invade the country. When Ulaszlo II
died in 1516, his ten-year-old son Louis II (1516-26) became
king, but a royal council appointed by the Diet ruled the
country. Hungary was in a state of near anarchy under the
magnates' rule. The king's finances were a shambles; he
borrowed to meet his household expenses despite the fact
that they totaled about one-third of the national income.
The country's defenses sagged as border guards went unpaid,
fortresses fell into disrepair, and initiatives to increase
taxes to reinforce defenses were stifled. In 1521 Sultan
Suleyman the Magnificent recognized Hungary's weakness and
seized Belgrade in preparation for an attack on Hungary. In
August 1526, he marched more than 100,000 troops into
Hungary's heartland, and at Mohacs they cut down all but
several hundred of the 25,000 ill-equipped soldiers whom
Louis II had been able to muster for the country's defense.
Louis himself died, thrown from a horse into a
bog. After Louis's
death, rival factions of Hungarian nobles simultaneously
elected two kings, Janos Zapolyai (1526-40) and Ferdinand
(1526-64). Each claimed sovereignty over the entire country
but lacked sufficient forces to eliminate his rival.
Zapolyai, a Hungarian and the military governor of
Transylvania, was recognized by the sultan and was supported
mostly by lesser nobles opposed to new foreign kings.
Ferdinand, the first Habsburg to occupy the Hungarian
throne, drew support from magnates in western Hungary who
hoped he could convince his brother, Holy Roman Emperor
Charles V, to expel the Turks. In 1538 George Martinuzzi,
Zapolyai's adviser, arranged a treaty between the rivals
that would have made Ferdinand sole monarch upon the death
of the then-childless Zapolyai. The deal collapsed when
Zapolyai married and fathered a son. Violence erupted, and
the Turks seized the opportunity, conquering the city of
Buda and then partitioning the country in 1541. Renaissance
and Reformation
<<< Contents
>>> Partition
of Hungary
Library of Congress Country Study Reign of Ulaszlo
II and Louis II
Library of Congress Country Study
This document is in the public domain. You may copy, download, print and distribute this work as you see fit.Every effort has been made to present this text accurately and cleanly, but no guarantees are made against errors. Neither Melissa Snell nor About.com may be held liable for any problems you experience with the text version or with any electronic form of the document.
