The Prince
by Nicolo Machiavelli
Chapter XXIV
Why the princes of Italy have lost their
states
The previous suggestions, carefully observed, will enable
a new prince to appear well established, and render him at
once more secure and fixed in the state than if he had been
long seated there. For the actions of a new prince are more
narrowly observed than those of an hereditary one, and when
they are seen to be able they gain more men and bind far
tighter than ancient blood; because men are attracted more
by the present than by the past, and when they find the
present good they enjoy it and seek no further; they will
also make the utmost defence of a prince if he fails them
not in other things. Thus it will be a double glory for him
to have established a new principality, and adorned and
strengthened it with good laws, good arms, good allies, and
with a good example; so will it be a double disgrace to him
who, born a prince, shall lose his state by want of
wisdom.
And if those seigniors are considered who have lost their
states in Italy in our times, such as the King of Naples,
the Duke of Milan, and others, there will be found in them,
firstly, one common defect in regard to arms from the causes
which have been discussed at length; in the next place, some
one of them will be seen, either to have had the people
hostile, or if he has had the people friendly, he has not
known how to secure the nobles. In the absence of these
defects states that have power enough to keep an army in the
field cannot be lost.
Philip of Macedon, not the father of Alexander the Great,
but he who was conquered by Titus Quintius, had not much
territory compared to the greatness of the Romans and of
Greece who attacked him, yet being a warlike man who knew
how to attract the people and secure the nobles, he
sustained the war against his enemies for many years, and if
in the end he lost the dominion of some cities, nevertheless
he retained the kingdom.
Therefore, do not let our princes accuse fortune for the
loss of their principalities after so many years'
possession, but rather their own sloth, because in quiet
times they never thought there could be a change (it is a
common defect in man not to make any provision in the calm
against the tempest), and when afterwards the bad times came
they thought of flight and not of defending themselves, and
they hoped that the people, disgusted with the insolence of
the conquerors, would recall them. This course, when others
fail, may be good, but it is very bad to have neglected all
other expedients for that, since you would never wish to
fall because you trusted to be able to find someone later on
to restore you. This again either does not happen, or, if it
does, it will not be for your security, because that
deliverance is of no avail which does not depend upon
yourself; those only are reliable, certain, and durable that
depend on yourself and your valour.
-
- The Prince
by Nicolo Machiavelli
Chapter XXIII
<<< Contents
>>> Chapter
XXV
|