Early in
the sixteenth century, Babur, who was descended from Timur
on his father's side and from Genghis Khan on his mother's,
was driven out of his father's kingdom in the Ferghana
Valley (which straddles contemporary Uzbekistan, Tajikistan
and Kyrgyzstan) by the Shaybani Uzbeks, who had wrested
Samarkand from the Timurids. After several unsuccessful
attempts to regain Ferghana and Samarkand, Babur crossed the
Amu Darya and captured Kabul from the last of its Mongol
rulers in 1504. In his invasion of India in 1526, Babur's
army of 12,000 defeated a less mobile force of 100,000 at
the First Battle of Panipat, about forty-five kilometers
northwest of Delhi. Although the seat of the great Mughal
Empire he founded was in India, Babur's memoirs stressed his
love for Kabul--both as a commercial strategic center as
well as a beautiful highland city with an "extremely
delightful" climate. Although
Indian Mughal rule technically lasted until the nineteenth
century, its days of power extended from 1526 until the
death of Babur's great-great-great-grandson, Aurangzeb in
1707. The Mughals originally had come from Central Asia, but
once they had taken India, the area that is now Afghanistan
was relegated to a mere outpost of the empire. Indeed,
during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, most of the
Hindu Kush area was hotly contested between the Mughals of
India and the powerful Safavids of Iran. Just as Kabul
dominates the high road from Central Asia into India,
Qandahar commands the only approach to India that skirts the
Hindu Kush. The strategically important Kabul-Qandahar axis
was the primary forces of competition between the Mughals
and the Safavids, and Qandahar itself changed hands several
times during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The
Safavids and the Mughals were not the only contenders,
however. Less powerful but closer at hand were the Uzbeks of
Central Asia, who fought for control of Herat in western
Afghanistan and for the northern regions as well where
neither the Mughals nor the Safavids were in
strength. The
Mughals sought not only to block the historical western
invasion routes into India but also to control the fiercely
independent tribes who accepted only nominal control from
Delhi in their mountain strongholds between the
Kabul-Qandahar axis and the Indus River--especially in the
Pashtun area of the Suleiman mountain range. As the area
around Qandahar changed hands back and forth between the two
great empires on either side, the local Pashtun tribes
exploited the situation to their advantage by extracting
concessions from both sides. By the middle of the
seventeenth century, the Mughals had abandoned the Hindu
Kush north of Kabul to the Uzbeks, and in 1748 they lost
Qandahar to the Safavids for the third and final
time. Toward
the end of the seventeenth century, as the power of both the
Safavids and the Mughals waned, new groups began to assert
themselves in the Hindu Kush area. Early in the eighteenth
century, one of the Pashtun tribes, the Hotaki, seized
Qandahar from the Safavids, and a group of Ghilzai Pashtuns
subsequently made greater inroads into Safavid territory.
The Ghilzai Pashtuns (see_____, ch. 2) even managed briefly
to hold the Safavid capital of Isfahan, and two members of
this tribe ascended the throne before the Ghilzai were
evicted from Iran by a warrior, Nadir Shah, who became known
as the "Persian Napoleon." Nadir
Shah conquered Qandahar and Kabul in 1738 along with
defeating a great Mughal army in India, plundering Delhi,
and massacring thousands of its people. He returned home
with vast treasures, including the Peacock Throne, which
thereafter served as a symbol of Iranian imperial
might. Mongol
Rule
<<< Contents
Library of Congress Country StudyMughal-Safavid
Rivalry, ca. 1500-1747
Library of Congress Country Study
This document is in the public domain. You may copy, download, print and distribute this work as you see fit.Every effort has been made to present this text accurately and cleanly, but no guarantees are made against errors. Neither Melissa Snell nor About.com may be held liable for any problems you experience with the text version or with any electronic form of the document.
More at the Medieval History Site
Site
Map
FAQs
Quizzes
Reviews
Daily
Features
More about the Knightly Newsletter

