Afonso
Henriques and subsequent Portuguese kings ruled by divine
right until a constitutional monarchy was established in the
early nineteenth century. The early kings were assisted by a
royal council composed of the king's closest advisers and
friends from among the higher nobility and clergy. The royal
council was staffed by a number of functionaries, such as
the chancellor, who kept the royal seal and was the highest
official in the land; the notary, who gave advice on legal
matters; the scribe, who wrote the king's letters and
documents (many early kings were illiterate); and the
majordomo, who commanded the king's household
guard. When
questions of exceptional importance arose, the king would
convoke the cortes, an expanded royal council that brought
together representatives of the three estates of the realm:
nobility, clergy, and commoners. The first such cortes was
called in 1211 at Coimbra in order to legitimate the
succession of Afonso II, Afonso Henriques's grandson, to the
throne, as well as to approve certain laws of the realm.
After the Cortes of Leiria, which was convoked in 1254 by
Afonso III, representatives of the self-governing settler
communities began to attend. Cortes were convoked at the
king's will and were limited to advising on issues raised by
the king and presenting petitions and complaints.
Resolutions passed by the cortes did not have the force of
law unless they were countersigned by the king. Later, the
cortes came to limit the power of the king somewhat, but
gradually the monarchy became absolute. The cortes was
convoked less and less frequently, and in 1697 it stopped
being called altogether. As to
territorial administration, northern Portugal was subdivided
into estates (terras), each a quasi-autonomous
political and economic unit of feudal suzerainity governed
by a nobleman (donatário) whose title to the
land was confirmed by the king. Religious administration was
carried out by the Roman Catholic Church, which divided the
north into bishoprics and parishes. In the south,
administration was the responsibility of the military
orders: Templars, Hospitallers, Calatravans, and Knights of
Saint James. In the center, administration fell to the
monastic orders: Benedictines, Franciscans, and Dominicans.
The towns and communities of settlers, as well as a certain
amount of land around them, were owned by the king, who was
responsible for regulating them. The
settler communities (concelhos) were each
recognized by a royal franchise, which granted local
privileges, set taxes, specified rights of self-government,
and controlled the relationship among the crown, the
concelho, and the donatário, if the
community was located within a terra. Each
concelho governed itself through an assembly chosen
from among its resident "good men" (homens-bons);
that is, freemen not subject to the jurisdiction of the
church, the local donatário, or the special
statutes governing Muslims and Jews. Each concelho
was administered by a local magistrate, who was assisted by
several assessors selected from among the
homens-bons of the assembly. The tutelary power of
the king was represented by an official (alcalde)
appointed by the king, who was empowered to intervene in
local matters on the king's behalf when necessary to ensure
justice and good administration. The degree of
self-government of these communities gradually declined as
the monarchy became increasingly centralized. During
its formative stages, Portugal had three social classes:
clergy, nobility, and commoners. By virtue of the religious
fervor of the times, the clergy was the predominant class.
It was the most learned, the wealthiest, and occupied the
highest office in the realm: the chancellorship. The clergy
comprised two categories; the bishops and parish priests of
the regular church hierarchy and the abbots and monks of the
religious and military orders. These two categories were
divided into the higher clergy (bishops and abbots) and low
clergy (priests and monks). The clergy enjoyed various
privileges and rights, such as judgment in ecclesiastical
courts according to canon law, exemption from taxes, and the
right to asylum from civil authorities within their
churches. The next
social class, the nobility, owed its privileged position
above all to its collaboration with the king in the
reconquest. The highest level among the nobility was made up
of the "rich men" (homens-ricos) who owned the
largest feudal estates, had private armies, and had
jurisdiction over great expanses of territory. Below them
were the lesser nobility, who held smaller estates and were
entrusted with the defense of castles and towns but did not
have private armies or administrative jurisdiction. Below
the lesser nobility were the highest class of free
commoners, the villein-knights, who maintained their own
horses and weaponry, serving the king as required. These
knights were often encouraged to settle in or near the
colonial communities of the frontier where they were granted
special privileges and organized raids against the Muslims
for their own profit. The
commoners formed the bottom of the social strata. Among them
the serfs were the lowest group. The most numerous group,
they were bound by heredity to the estates of the crown,
nobility, and clergy, where they were occupied in
agriculture, stockraising, and village crafts. Serfs could
become free by serving as colonists in the underpopulated
territories in the south. The second lowest group consisted
of the clients, that is, freemen who did not own property
and received protection from an overlord in exchange for
service. Above the clients were the villein-knights, who
formed a stratum that merged the commoners with the
nobility. Finally, outside the basic social structure were
the slaves, usually Muslim captives, who tilled the lands of
the military orders in the Alentejo. Settlement
and Cultivation
<<< Contents
>>> Control
of the Royal Patrimony
Library of Congress Country StudyPolitical
and Social Organization
Library of Congress Country Study
This document is in the public domain. You may copy, download, print and distribute this work as you see fit.Every effort has been made to present this text accurately and cleanly, but no guarantees are made against errors. Neither Melissa Snell nor About.com may be held liable for any problems you experience with the text version or with any electronic form of the document.
More at the Medieval History Site
Site
Map
FAQs
Quizzes
Reviews
Daily
Features
More about the Knightly Newsletter

