By the end of the
sixth century B.C., India's northwest was integrated into
the Persian Achaemenid Empire and became one of its
satrapies. This integration marked the beginning of
administrative contacts between Central Asia and
India. Although Indian
accounts to a large extent ignored Alexander the Great's
Indus campaign in 326 B.C., Greek writers recorded their
impressions of the general conditions prevailing in South
Asia during this period. Thus, the year 326 B.C. provides
the first clear and historically verifiable date in Indian
history. A two-way cultural fusion between several
Indo-Greek elements--especially in art, architecture, and
coinage--occurred in the next several hundred years. North
India's political landscape was transformed by the emergence
of Magadha in the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain. In 322 B.C.,
Magadha, under the rule of Chandragupta Maurya, began to
assert its hegemony over neighboring areas. Chandragupta,
who ruled from 324 to 301 B.C., was the architect of the
first Indian imperial power--the Mauryan Empire (326-184
B.C.)--whose capital was Pataliputra, near modern-day Patna,
in Bihar. Situated on rich
alluvial soil and near mineral deposits, especially iron,
Magadha was at the center of bustling commerce and trade.
The capital was a city of magnificent palaces, temples, a
university, a library, gardens, and parks, as reported by
Megasthenes, the third-century B.C. Greek historian and
ambassador to the Mauryan court. Legend states that
Chandragupta's success was due in large measure to his
adviser Kautilya, the Brahman author of the
Arthashastra (Science of Material Gain), a textbook
that outlined governmental administration and political
strategy. There was a highly centralized and hierarchical
government with a large staff, which regulated tax
collection, trade and commerce, industrial arts, mining,
vital statistics, welfare of foreigners, maintenance of
public places including markets and temples, and
prostitutes. A large standing army and a well-developed
espionage system were maintained. The empire was divided
into provinces, districts, and villages governed by a host
of centrally appointed local officials, who replicated the
functions of the central administration. Ashoka, grandson
of Chandragupta, ruled from 269 to 232 B.C. and was one of
India's most illustrious rulers. Ashoka's inscriptions
chiseled on rocks and stone pillars located at strategic
locations throughout his empire--such as Lampaka (Laghman in
modern Afghanistan), Mahastan (in modern Bangladesh), and
Brahmagiri (in Karnataka)--constitute the second set of
datable historical records. According to some of the
inscriptions, in the aftermath of the carnage resulting from
his campaign against the powerful kingdom of Kalinga (modern
Orissa), Ashoka renounced bloodshed and pursued a policy of
nonviolence or ahimsa, espousing a theory of rule by
righteousness. His toleration for different religious
beliefs and languages reflected the realities of India's
regional pluralism although he personally seems to have
followed Buddhism (see Buddhism, ch. 3). Early Buddhist
stories assert that he convened a Buddhist council at his
capital, regularly undertook tours within his realm, and
sent Buddhist missionary ambassadors to Sri
Lanka. Contacts
established with the Hellenistic world during the reign of
Ashoka's predecessors served him well. He sent
diplomatic-cum-religious missions to the rulers of Syria,
Macedonia, and Epirus, who learned about India's religious
traditions, especially Buddhism. India's northwest retained
many Persian cultural elements, which might explain Ashoka's
rock inscriptions--such inscriptions were commonly
associated with Persian rulers. Ashoka's Greek and Aramaic
inscriptions found in Kandahar in Afghanistan may also
reveal his desire to maintain ties with people outside of
India. After the
disintegration of the Mauryan Empire in the second century
B.C., South Asia became a collage of regional powers with
overlapping boundaries. India's unguarded northwestern
border again attracted a series of invaders between 200 B.C.
and A.D. 300. As the Aryans had done, the invaders became
"Indianized" in the process of their conquest and
settlement. Also, this period witnessed remarkable
intellectual and artistic achievements inspired by cultural
diffusion and syncretism. The Indo-Greeks, or the Bactrians,
of the northwest contributed to the development of
numismatics; they were followed by another group, the Shakas
(or Scythians), from the steppes of Central Asia, who
settled in western India. Still other nomadic people, the
Yuezhi, who were forced out of the Inner Asian steppes of
Mongolia, drove the Shakas out of northwestern India and
established the Kushana Kingdom (first century B.C.-third
century A.D.). The Kushana Kingdom controlled parts of
Afghanistan and Iran, and in India the realm stretched from
Purushapura (modern Peshawar, Pakistan) in the northwest, to
Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh) in the east, and to Sanchi (Madhya
Pradesh) in the south. For a short period, the kingdom
reached still farther east, to Pataliputra. The Kushana
Kingdom was the crucible of trade among the Indian, Persian,
Chinese, and Roman empires and controlled a critical part of
the legendary Silk Road. Kanishka, who reigned for two
decades starting around A.D. 78, was the most noteworthy
Kushana ruler. He converted to Buddhism and convened a great
Buddhist council in Kashmir. The Kushanas were patrons of
Gandharan art, a synthesis between Greek and Indian styles,
and Sanskrit literature. They initiated a new era called
Shaka in A.D. 78, and their calendar, which was formally
recognized by India for civil purposes starting on March 22,
1957, is still in use. Kingdoms
and Empires
<<< Contents
>>> The
Deccan and the South
Library of Congress Country StudyThe Mauryan
Empire
Library of Congress Country Study
This document is in the public domain. You may copy, download, print and distribute this work as you see fit.Every effort has been made to present this text accurately and cleanly, but no guarantees are made against errors. Neither Melissa Snell nor About.com may be held liable for any problems you experience with the text version or with any electronic form of the document.
