When Gupta
disintegration was complete, the classical patterns of
civilization continued to thrive not only in the middle
Ganga Valley and the kingdoms that emerged on the heels of
Gupta demise but also in the Deccan and in South India,
which acquired a more prominent place in history. In fact,
from the mid-seventh to the mid-thirteenth centuries,
regionalism was the dominant theme of political or dynastic
history of South Asia. Three features, as political
scientist Radha Champakalakshmi has noted, commonly
characterize the sociopolitical realities of this period.
First, the spread of Brahmanical religions was a two-way
process of Sanskritization of local cults and localization
of Brahmanical social order. Second was the ascendancy of
the Brahman priestly and landowning groups that later
dominated regional institutions and political developments.
Third, because of the seesawing of numerous dynasties that
had a remarkable ability to survive perennial military
attacks, regional kingdoms faced frequent defeats but seldom
total annihilation. Peninsular India
was involved in an eighth-century tripartite power struggle
among the Chalukyas (556-757) of Vatapi, the Pallavas
(300-888) of Kanchipuram, and the Pandyas (seventh through
the tenth centuries) of Madurai. The Chalukya rulers were
overthrown by their subordinates, the Rashtrakutas, who
ruled from 753 to 973. Although both the Pallava and Pandya
kingdoms were enemies, the real struggle for political
domination was between the Pallava and Chalukya
realms. Despite
interregional conflicts, local autonomy was preserved to a
far greater degree in the south where it had prevailed for
centuries. The absence of a highly centralized government
was associated with a corresponding local autonomy in the
administration of villages and districts. Extensive and
well-documented overland and maritime trade flourished with
the Arabs on the west coast and with Southeast Asia. Trade
facilitated cultural diffusion in Southeast Asia, where
local elites selectively but willingly adopted Indian art,
architecture, literature, and social customs. The interdynastic
rivalry and seasonal raids into each other's territory
notwithstanding, the rulers in the Deccan and South India
patronized all three religions--Buddhism, Hinduism, and
Jainism. The religions vied with each other for royal favor,
expressed in land grants but more importantly in the
creation of monumental temples, which remain architectural
wonders. The cave temples of Elephanta Island (near Bombay,
or Mumbai in Marathi), Ajanta, and Ellora (in Maharashtra),
and structural temples of Kanchipuram (in Tamil Nadu) are
enduring legacies of otherwise warring regional rulers. By
the mid-seventh century, Buddhism and Jainism began to
decline as sectarian Hindu devotional cults of Shiva and
Vishnu vigorously competed for popular support. Although Sanskrit
was the language of learning and theology in South India, as
it was in the north, the growth of the bhakti
(devotional) movements enhanced the crystallization of
vernacular literature in all four major Dravidian languages:
Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, and Kannada; they often borrowed
themes and vocabulary from Sanskrit but preserved much local
cultural lore. Examples of Tamil literature include two
major poems, Cilappatikaram (The Jewelled Anklet)
and Manimekalai (The Jewelled Belt); the body of
devotional literature of Shaivism and Vaishnavism--Hindu
devotional movements; and the reworking of the
Ramayana by Kamban in the twelfth century. A
nationwide cultural synthesis had taken place with a minimum
of common characteristics in the various regions of South
Asia, but the process of cultural infusion and assimilation
would continue to shape and influence India's history
through the centuries.
Library of Congress Country StudyThe Southern
Rivals
Library of Congress Country Study
This document is in the public domain. You may copy, download, print and distribute this work as you see fit.Every effort has been made to present this text accurately and cleanly, but no guarantees are made against errors. Neither Melissa Snell nor About.com may be held liable for any problems you experience with the text version or with any electronic form of the document.
